The Role of Quantitative CT and Radiomic Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Pulmonary Fibrosis

Study Purpose

This observational study involves obtaining 2 chest CT scans; a historical baseline CT within ±1 year of enrollment into PRECISIONS, and a follow-up CT (either historical or prospective) 12 months ± 180 days after the baseline CT. Many IPF patients will have a CT scan every 12 months for disease monitoring and cancer screening. Participants will have the option to share historical CTs only or they can choose to have a research CT done for the follow-up scan, if a scan for clinical purposes is not available.

Recruitment Criteria

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Healthy volunteers are participants who do not have a disease or condition, or related conditions or symptoms

No
Study Type

An interventional clinical study is where participants are assigned to receive one or more interventions (or no intervention) so that researchers can evaluate the effects of the interventions on biomedical or health-related outcomes.


An observational clinical study is where participants identified as belonging to study groups are assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.


Searching Both is inclusive of interventional and observational studies.

Observational
Eligible Ages 40 Years and Over
Gender All
More Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. ≥ 40 years of age. 2. Diagnosed with IPF according to 2018 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT confirmed by the enrolling investigator. 3. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant. 2. Women of childbearing potential not willing to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use two adequate methods of contraception, including at least one method with a failure rate of <1% per year during study participation* 3. Significant medical, surgical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator would affect subject safety or potential to complete the research study.
  • - A woman is considered to be of childbearing potential if she is post-monarchical, has not reached a postmenopausal state (≥ 12 continuous months of amenorrhea with no identified cause other than menopause), and has not undergone surgical sterilization (removal of ovaries and/or uterus).
Examples of contraceptive methods with a failure rate of <1% per year include bilateral tubal ligation, male sterilization, established and proper use of hormonal contraceptives that inhibit ovulation, hormone-releasing intrauterine devices, and copper intrauterine devices.

Trial Details

Trial ID:

This trial id was obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, providing information on publicly and privately supported clinical studies of human participants with locations in all 50 States and in 196 countries.

NCT06323876
Phase

Phase 1: Studies that emphasize safety and how the drug is metabolized and excreted in humans.

Phase 2: Studies that gather preliminary data on effectiveness (whether the drug works in people who have a certain disease or condition) and additional safety data.

Phase 3: Studies that gather more information about safety and effectiveness by studying different populations and different dosages and by using the drug in combination with other drugs.

Phase 4: Studies occurring after FDA has approved a drug for marketing, efficacy, or optimal use.

Lead Sponsor

The sponsor is the organization or person who oversees the clinical study and is responsible for analyzing the study data.

University of Virginia
Principal Investigator

The person who is responsible for the scientific and technical direction of the entire clinical study.

Noth Imre, MDJohn Kim
Principal Investigator Affiliation Division of Pulmonary and Critical CareDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care
Agency Class

Category of organization(s) involved as sponsor (and collaborator) supporting the trial.

Other, NIH
Overall Status Not yet recruiting
Countries
Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Additional Details

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains deadly despite two FDA-approved therapies. Forced vital capacity (FVC), a one-dimensional assessment of lung function that requires three effort-dependent and error-prone maneuvers, is the standard for evaluating disease severity and monitoring progression. FVC indirectly measures disease activity and is thus insensitive to subtle change. These limitations hamper therapeutic trials. The Gender, Age, and Physiology (GAP) score improves on FVC alone and is the most used scoring model for prognostication, but gender and age aren't influenced by treatment. Modifiable intermediate molecular markers and other metrics for assessing disease severity and progression remain unmet needs for aiding drug development and clinical decision-making. Computed tomography (CT) captures morphologic patterns and the extent of fibrosis noninvasively. Advances in quantitative CT enable objective detection and quantitation of anatomy, and highly dimensional image features, often termed radiomic, can identify sub-visual characteristics. The investigators seek to evaluate radiomic features alone and in conjunction with other disease dimensions for prognostication and response to treatment in IPF. The investigators overall objectives are to identify and validate radiologic features, such as total extent of lung fibrosis, for disease activity and intermediate response to therapy, and understand where to position these powerful markers. The investigators hypothesize that DTA scores will contribute to prediction of disease progression and that molecular markers will enhance that performance. Aim 1: The investigators will validate quantitative CT and radiomic markers for disease progression by independent replication in separate cohorts. The investigators hypothesize that quantitative CT markers will predict disease progression in UVA/Chicago cohorts. Baseline and subsequent CT scans have been voluntarily collected in many PFF-PR cases. The investigators propose collection of 1-year HRCTs in UVA/Chicago participants to evaluate: a) the prognostic value of baseline quantitative CT and radiomic markers (i.e. DTA) in predicting time to progression defined as either 10% relative decline in FVC, lung transplant, or death from any cause, b) associations between changes in CT biomarkers on sequential CT and changes in 1-year FVC and DLCO, and c) change in CT associated with drug treatment. This aim will establish the relative and synergistic value of CT to established physiologic markers. Aim 2: The investigators will determine if candidate genetic variants for IPF susceptibility and survival are associated with the DTA score and improve predictive performance for survival. The investigators hypothesize that variants in MUC5B, TOLLIP, and Telomere lengths (TL) will enhance DTA fibrosis score associations with progression-free survival in IPF. The investigators will perform a cross-sectional analysis of PFF-PR cases comparing quantitative CT and radiomic markers at baseline with and without "at risk" genotypes for association with severity and progression (decline in FVC over time). This will ascertain what markers improve performance of the DTA fibrosis extent scores using Cox regression analysis and accuracy metrics from Aim 1. Findings will be replicated in UVA/Chicago cohort and in the prospective PRECISIONS cohort. This aim will establish the additive value of genetic markers. Aim 3: The investigators will assess whether DTA and radiomic markers are additive/synergistic with plasma protein and blood transcriptome markers for disease progression. The investigators hypothesize that selected protein and transcriptomic markers will prove additive to DTA fibrosis extent for prediction of progression-free survival whereas other markers correlated with DTA will not. The investigators have chosen published markers from a 4-protein panel signature, along with CCL18, as examples, given their current level of replication and promise. The investigators will also include a 25-gene FVC predictor for disease progression. Similar analyses, as outlined in Aims 1 and 2, will determine their additive information value.

Arms & Interventions

Arms

: University of Chicago

This cohort will have prior consent to the Natural History of Interstitial Lung Disease, which is an ongoing, longitudinal cohort of patients with clinically diagnosed ILD, including IPF. Patients are recruited from University of Chicago Interstitial Lung Disease Program during their clinic visit. Blood, plasma, and serum samples are collected upon enrollment and stored in a biorepository at University of Chicago. Subsets of patients have repeat blood draw at return clinic visits for specific research studies. The investigators propose collection of 1-year HRCTs, FVC, and DLCO.

: University of Virginia

This cohort will have prior consent to the Natural History of Interstitial Lung Disease, which is an ongoing, longitudinal cohort of patients with clinically diagnosed ILD, including IPF. Patients are recruited from the UVA Interstitial Lung Disease Program during their clinic visit. Blood, plasma, and serum samples are collected upon enrollment and stored in a biorepository at UVA (Pinn Hall RM#2232B, IRB#20937). Subsets of patients have repeat blood draw at return clinic visits for specific research studies. The investigators propose collection of 1-year HRCTs, FVC, and DLCO.

Interventions

Diagnostic Test: - HRCT

High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan is a medical imaging technique used to obtain detailed internal images of the body. HRCT images will be obtained at 0 and 12 months.

Diagnostic Test: - Blood Draw

During blood draw, someone uses a needle to take blood from a vein, usually in your arm.

Contact Information

This trial has no sites locations listed at this time. If you are interested in learning more, you can contact the trial's primary contact:

Roselove Nunoo-Asare

rnn3b@uvahealth.org

4342436074

For additional contact information, you can also visit the trial on clinicaltrials.gov.

The content provided on clinical trials is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical consultation with your healthcare provider. We do not recommend or endorse any specific study and you are advised to discuss the information shown with your healthcare provider. While we believe the information presented on this website to be accurate at the time of writing, we do not guarantee that its contents are correct, complete, or applicable to any particular individual situation. We strongly encourage individuals to seek out appropriate medical advice and treatment from their physicians. We cannot guarantee the availability of any clinical trial listed and will not be responsible if you are considered ineligible to participate in a given clinical trial. We are also not liable for any injury arising as a result of participation.